Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is a process of “integrating the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and the patient’s unique values and circumstances” (Straus, Glasziou, Richardson, & Haynes, 2011).
And "it also requires the health professional to consider characteristics of the practice context in which they work." (Hoffman, Bennett, & Del Mar, 2017).
Evidence-Based Practice has been expanded from Evidence-Based Medicine to apply to other health professions and other disciplines. This guide concentrates on (but is not exclusive to) EBP as it applies to the health professions.
Evidence-Based Practice vs Evidence-Informed Practice
A term that is sometimes used, especially in nursing research, is Evidence-Informed Practice. According to Woodbury and Kuhnke (2014), this term is used instead of, or as well as, Evidence-Based Practice. They suggest that the term gives more flexibility regarding the nature of evidence and its use; that is, the term "implies that many different levels of evidence and types of evidence … are needed and used to support decisions in clinical practice.” (p. 29)
Hoffmann, T., Bennett, S., & Del Mar, C. (2024). Evidence-based practice across the health professions (4th ed.). Elsevier.
Straus, S. E., Glasziou, P., Richardson, W. S., & Haynes, R. B. (2019). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (5th ed.). Elsevier.
Woodbury, M. G., & Kuhnke, J. L. (2014). Evidence-based practice vs. evidence-informed practice: What's the difference? Wound Care Canada, 12(1), 26-29.
Evidence-Based Practice is usually seen as having five steps:
Step 1 | ASK | Express the problem as a clinical question (Ask the question) |
Step 2 | ACQUIRE | Find evidence-based resources that answer the question (Acquire the evidence) |
Step 3 | APPRAISE | Critically appraise the evidence to assess its validity (Appraise the evidence) |
Step 4 | APPLY | Apply the evidence (Apply the evidence to the patient(s) or problem) |
Step 5 | ASSESS/AUDIT | Evaluate your performance in carrying out Steps 1 - 4 (Assess and audit the process) |
Hoffman, Bennett, and Del Mar point out that Evidence-Based Practice is not the same as, or limited to, randomised controlled trials:
"... it is certainly true that randomised controlled trials are the cornerstone of research investigating whether interventions (treatments) work. However, questions about the effectiveness of interventions are not the only type of clinical question ." (Hoffman, Bennett, & Del Mar, 2017).
Health professionals also need information about questions of:
It's possible that each question will require a different type of research design, and randomised controlled trials are just one type of research design. Others include:
Hoffmann, T., Bennett, S., & Del Mar, C. (2024). Evidence-based practice across the health professions (4th ed.). Elsevier Australia.
© Charles Sturt University. Except for trademarks, logos and where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Please attribute Charles Sturt University Library.
Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples.
Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.