The PICO concept is commonly used to formulate the clinical question.
It is especially useful for questions that are about a therapy or intervention. PICO is commonly used when one intervention is being compared with another, or with no intervention at all.
Each of the 4 letters identifies a key concept that needs to be in research articles that will answer the question:
|P||Patient / Population / Problem||Start with the patient, or group of patients, or problem|
|I||Intervention||What is the proposed intervention?|
|C||Comparison||What is the main alternative, to compare with the intervention? This might be: no intervention.|
|O||Outcome||What is the anticipated or hoped-for outcome?|
Another acronym that is sometimes used is PICOTT. The extra letters are for:
|T||Type of Question||You can have questions of different types. They can be categorised as a diagnosis, prognosis, therapy, aetiology/harm, or prevention question.|
|T||Type of Study||This asks what study design would best answer the question: randomised controlled trial; cohort study; case controlled study; case series; case series; case report etc.|
|See What's the best evidence? - levels of evidence and Question types and study types.|
Here is a health example of a clinical problem formulated using PICO:
"I work in an aged care facility where urinary tract infections are a common problem. I've heard that cranberry juice can help prevent UTIs. I wonder if there's any evidence for that and whether it might help our patients?"
P Patients in aged care homes
I Cranberry juice
C No intervention (status quo)
O Prevention of UTIs.
Here is a non-health example:
"I conduct Library induction classes for new students in an academic library. I wonder if playing music during the class would improve their retention of information and their experience of using the library."
P First year students at an academic library attending face-to-face induction classes
I Playing background music in the classroom
C No intervention (status quo)
O Increased retention of information and improved student comfort with the library.
The SPIDER tool can be used when dealing with qualitative research questions - that is, when the research is about attitudes and experiences rather than scientifically measurable data. It focuses less on the intervention and more on the design of the study, and deals with "samples" rather than a "patient" or "populations".
|S||Sample||The group of participants in qualitative research|
|PI||Phenomenon of Interest||The how and why of behaviours and experiences|
|D||Design||How the study was devised and conducted|
|E||Evaluation||The measurement of outcome might be subjective and not necessarily empirical|
|R||Research Type||Qualitative, or quantitative, or mixed?|
Research questions framed using the SPIDER tool tend to begin with "What are the experiences of ...?"
"What are the experiences of first year university students in using their library?"
S First year university students
PI Library use
E Experiences (of using the Library)
Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples.
Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.