Use the CRAP test to evaluate any resources you want to use in your assessments.
History of educational theories - older resources may be appropriate
Social media in education - older resources may not be appropriate
A satirical news website (e.g. Betoota Advocate)
A not for profit media group sourcing content from academics and researchers (e.g. The Conversation)
An article written by a self-appointed expert that appears on a blog
A peer reviewed article written by a team of university academics
A webpage on diabetes from a pharmacy company that produces drugs to treat diabetes. They may have a vested interest.
Diabetes information from a government website such as Australian Institute of Health & Welfare (AIHW). They have no vested interest.
Using credible information will improve the quality of your assessment and may result in better marks, but how can you tell whether the resources you've found are credible and suitable for your assessment? Have you been asked to use peer reviewed or refereed articles? Are you using authoritative websites?
The information below will help you evaluate the information you find, in books, journal articles, or online to make sure it’s reliable.
Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples.
Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.