Skip to Main Content

Information and Digital Literacies GLO: In the curriculum

Integrating the Information and Digital Literacies GLO

To effectively integrate the Information and Digital Literacies GLO, embed it systematically across subjects, learning outcomes, assessment tasks, and teaching activities.

This includes: 

  • Mapping information and digital literacies across the course to identify when and how each competency is introduced, developed, and demonstrated 
  • Scaffolding the development of these literacies throughout the course, from foundational to advanced levels 
  • Including information, digital, and AI literacy explicitly in subject learning outcomes, assessment tasks, and marking criteria 
  • Designing authentic assessments that encourage students to find, evaluate and ethically use information, digital tools, and AI-generated content 
  • Using a variety of assessment methods (e.g. annotated bibliographies, digital presentations, reflective critiques of AI tools) to assess literacy skills in context 
  • Embedding technology-enhanced learning activities, including the use of discipline-relevant digital tools, platforms, and generative AI, to support skill development 
  • Encouraging ethical and critical engagement with emerging technologies, especially AI, by prompting reflection, source-checking, and transparency in use 
  • This approach ensures students build the confidence, adaptability, and critical awareness needed to thrive in academic, professional, and digital environments. 

Learning activities and assessments

To effectively develop students’ information, digital, and AI literacy capabilities, design and incorporate activities and assessments that foster critical engagement with information and technology. The following evidence-based teaching practices can be used across all disciplines to embed the GLO into learning and assessment in meaningful, authentic ways: 

Set clear expectations for information use

  • Clearly articulate the types of information sources students are expected to use (e.g., peer-reviewed, discipline-specific, credible grey literature). 
  • Explicitly teach students how to distinguish between scholarly and non-scholarly sources, including AI-generated content, and where ambiguities may arise (e.g., expert blogs, preprints). 
  • Let students know that the quality and appropriateness of sources, including how they evaluate and integrate AI outputs, will contribute to their grades. 
  • Engage with the Library to co-design or embed learning activities, guides, or tutorials to support students’ research and information evaluation skills. 

Design scaffolding into assessments 

  • Break larger research-based tasks into stages: e.g., a research question, a short outline, an annotated bibliography, and then the final paper or presentation. 
  • Use formative checkpoints to give feedback on students’ research processes, choice of sources, and use of AI tools. 
  • Encourage the use of AI responsibly, asking students to reflect on how they used the tool, what limitations they encountered, and how they validated outputs. 

Promote independent thinking and critical evaluation 

  • Use assessments that require students to compare, contrast, synthesise, and evaluate competing ideas or perspectives. 
  • Design tasks that challenge students to analyse the credibility, bias, and reliability of information and technologies, especially AI-generated or algorithmically filtered content. 
  • Incorporate frameworks such as SIFT or the CRAP test to support critical evaluation. 

Introduce and model ethical use of digital tools and AI 

  • Integrate discipline-relevant digital tools (e.g., visualisation tools, collaborative platforms) into learning activities and assessment. 
  • Encourage ethical and professional digital communication and behaviour, including proper citation, copyright and responsible sharing of information and media. 
  • Discuss ethical and legal issues related to digital tools and AI in your discipline through case studies or guided discussions. 

Support digital citizenship and online engagement 

  • Facilitate structured opportunities for students to collaborate and communicate online using tools such as wikis, blogs, Padlet, or discussion forums. 
  • Promote respectful and inclusive online communication, and guide students in defining appropriate digital etiquette for academic and professional contexts. 
  • Encourage students to reflect on the social, cultural, and professional implications of digital technologies and AI, including building a professional online presence (e.g., creating a LinkedIn profile or digital portfolio). 
  • Use discipline-specific examples to explore the broader societal impact of digital technologies and AI, including bias, misinformation, automation and access. 

Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples.Acknowledgement of Country

Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.