This step aims to tease out the topic with a series of questions, this will result in your ideas being developed into issues for your research.
Think about the following:
- What do you want to say?
- Why this? What's your purpose, what decision/change/action are you looking for?
- What context makes your views relevant?
- What evidence is there?
- Why do your findings matter?
- To whom do they matter?
- Who will your findings affect?
Formulating a research question
Think about asking a how or why question. Keep the ideas of clarity, focus and complexity in mind.
Clarity
The unclear version of the question below doesn’t specify which social networking sites or suggest what kind of harm the sites might be causing. It also assumes that this “harm” is proven and/or accepted. The clearer version specifies sites (MySpace and Facebook), the type of potential harm (privacy issues), and who may be experiencing that harm (users). A strong research question should never leave room for ambiguity or interpretation.
Unclear question - Why are social networking sites harmful?
Clear question - How are online users experiencing or addressing privacy issues on social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook?
Focused
The unfocused research question below is so broad that it couldn’t be adequately answered in a book-length piece, let alone a standard college-level paper. The focused version narrows down to a specific effect of global warming (glacial melting), a specific place (Antarctica), and a specific animal that is affected (penguins). It also requires the writer to take a stance on which effect has the greatest impact on the affected animal. When in doubt, make a research question as narrow and focused as possible.
Unfocused question: What is the effect on the environment of global warming?
Focused question: How is glacial melting affecting penguins in Antarctica?
Simple vs. Complex
The simple version of the question below can be looked up online and answered in a few factual sentences; it leaves no room for analysis. The more complex version is written in two parts; it is thought-provoking and requires both significant investigation and evaluation from the writer. As a general rule of thumb, if a quick Google search can answer a research question, it’s likely not very effective.
Too simple: How are doctors addressing diabetes in Australia?
Appropriately complex: What are common traits of those suffering from diabetes in Australia, and how can these commonalities be used to aid the medical community in the prevention of the disease?