Contact us if you have an enquiry about Covidence for your project. Complete the Covidence Review Request form and provide us with an outline of your project to assist us assess the request. Your School Librarian will be in contact to discuss your project. 

Please contact a librarian from your Faculty Team for assistance with the review process. 

For more general Library assistance, call 1800 275 278, try our online chat, or email the Library.

• Literature Review
  
  
• Evidence-Based Practice
   
• Database Help
   
• EndNote
   
• EndNote and NVivo for Literature Review
   
• Grey Literature
   
• Where to Publish

Aromataris, E. & Munn, Z (Eds.) (2020). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Joanna Briggs Institute. 
https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
 

Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
 

Buccheri, R. K., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines for evidence‐based practice. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(6), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12258 

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. (2008). Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.  https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
 

DiCenso, A., Bayley, L., & Haynes, R. B. (2009). Accessing pre-appraised evidence: Fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evidence Based Nursing, 12(4), 99-101. http://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.12.4.99-b 

Elamin, M. B., Flynn, D. N., Bassler, D., Briel, M., Alonso-Coello, P., Karanicolas, P. J., . . . Kunz, R. (2009). Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(5), 506-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.016
 

Foster, M. J., & Jewell, S. T. (Eds.). (2017). Assembling the pieces of a systematic review: A guide for librarians. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/csuau/detail.action?docID=4803117
 

Garner, P., Hopewell, S., Chandler, J., MacLehose, H., Akl, E. A., Beyene, J., Chang, S., Churchill, R., Dearness, K., Guyatt, G., Lefebvre, C., Liles, B., Marshall, R., Martínez García, L., Mavergames, C., Nasser, M., Qaseem, A., Sampson, M., Soares-Weiser, K., Takwoingi, Y., ... Schünemann, H. J. (2016). When and how to update systematic reviews: Consensus and checklist. BMJ, 354:i3507. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3507
 

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J. & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2020, September). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Version 6.1. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
 

Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680309600304
 

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
 

Marshall, G., & Sykes, A. E. (2011). Systematic reviews: A guide for radiographers and other health care professionals. Radiography, 17(2), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2010.08.007
 

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
 

O'Brien, A. M., & Mc Guckin, C. (2016). The systematic literature review method: Trials and tribulations of electronic database searching at Doctoral level. Sage Research Methods. https://methods-sagepub-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/case/systematic-literature-review-electronic-database-searching-doctoral-level
 

Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
 

Peters, M. D. (2017). Managing and coding references for systematic reviews and scoping reviews in EndNote. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2017.1259891
 

PLoS Medicine Editors. (2011). Best practice in systematic reviews: The importance of protocols and registration. PLoS Medicine, 8(2), e1001009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009

You can check in Primo Search for other resources.