It is important to avoid publishing with publishers who display unethical practices. These Publishers often claim that your work will be peer reviewed. Sometimes their web pages also display fictitious impact factors. These publishers' motivation is to profit from the fee you pay for publication. The publisher could potentially own the article's copyright under the laws of the country in which the publisher resides. You can damage your reputation when publishing with predatory publishers. Your work is unlikely to be indexed or accessible in major databases.
|
Before submitting to any journal, you should check:
More information is available from ‘Think, Check, Submit’
Some resources to help you avoid predatory publishers:
Some ‘predatory or deceptive publishers’ have taken the development of the open access author-pays academic publishing model, as an opportunity to make money.
Predatory or deceptive publishers are known to:
If you are considering publishing in one of the MDPI journals, we would advise you to first do a critical review of the journal in question.
The editorial and peer review processes of publisher MDPI have recently been called into question. Based on concerns expressed about publishing ethics and varying levels of quality, questions have been raised about whether publishing with MDPI is in line with shared values and strategies. The University Library believes there is no uniform standard across all MDPI journals, and recommends that anyone considering publishing with MDPI should critically review the journal in question.
Guidance from Charles Sturt University can be found in the Guidance Note: Navigating academic publishing amid open access opportunities and predatory publishers
This template might be used to send to the predatory journal publisher if you realise that your manuscript has mistakenly been submitted to a predatory publisher. There is no guarantee that the withdrawal of the manuscript will be successful.
Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol, 12(3), 353-362. doi:10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x
Mercier, E., Tardif, P.-A., Moore, L., Le Sage, N., & Cameron, P. A. (2017). Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience. Postgraduate Medical Journal. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135097
Zakout, Y.MA. Predatory Publishers/Journals in Medical Sciences: How to Avoid, Stop, and What to Do after Being Scammed by Them?. J Gastrointest Canc 51, 782–787 (2020). https://doi-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/10.1007/s12029-020-00418-8
Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples.
Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.