So, you have found articles, books and maybe even some web resources.
How can you tell whether your resources are suitable for your assessment? Have you been asked to use peer reviewed or refereed articles?
Using Generative A1, it's important to understand there are risks. Can AI tools provide authoritative sources?
The information and videos below will help you to pick up strategies to evaluate Library resources, web resources, AI tools and find peer reviewed articles.
Articles published in peer-reviewed or refereed journals have been through a formal approval process. An editor and one or more subject specialists review the article before it is accepted for publication. This process is intended to ensure that the article is accurate, well-researched, and contributes to the body of knowledge in the field.
Primo Search and some Journal Databases include an option to limit your search to scholarly or peer-reviewed articles, and some other databases include this information as part of an article record. While this is an indication that the article could be peer-reviewed, the definitive way to find out is to use Ulrichsweb Global Periodicals Directory. You can access this database from the Library's list of U-databases.
Generative AI tools have access to a vast amount of information and can certainly provide information about authoritative sources for different study topics. However, it is important to note that not all the information provided by the model may be accurate or up-to-date. It is always a good idea to verify any information provided by these tools with multiple sources and to consider the credibility of the source before using it for research or academic purposes.
To find authoritative sources, you can ask things like:
For many topics, new authors, articles or books may have been published in recent years. You will miss key information if you rely solely on their recommendations.
Just a word of warning, references generated by ChatGPT 3.0 and earlier are not real. Try using ChatGPT4 through Bing. It gives you real references.
Just be aware of the risks associated with using AI tools. As outlined, think about academic integrity, plagiarism, inaccurate content, intellectual property and privacy concerns.
Currency |
Is it current enough for your topic? A general rule is to use resources published in the last 5 years. |
Reliability |
Is the source reputable? Is it peer reviewed? Does the creator provide references? Do those references pass the CRAP test? |
Authority |
Who is the creator or author? What are their qualifications? Are they an expert in the field? |
Purpose |
Is it fact or opinion? Is it biased or balanced? Is the creator trying to sell you something? |
The type of domain provides you a hint as to the reliability of the website at which you are looking.
.edu (educational institution) .gov (government)
|
These are more likely to be reliable and unbiased. |
.org (non-profit organisation) .asn (non-commercial organisation) |
Sometimes these organisations can be biased toward one side of an issue that is actually quite complex. |
.com (commercial site) .net (network) |
Try to avoid these sites as they are likely to be unreliable. .net is the domain given to any site that doesn't fit into the other domain categories. |
If you find a .com or .net site that you think is ok, look at the currency, reliability, authority and purpose to see if your suspicion is supported by evidence.
Have you been asked to use Generative AI Tools (GAITs) in your assessment? Or are you thinking of using GAITs for research and study?
Make sure you are aware of the risks associated with using GAITs:
For more information see:
You have access to Microsoft Copilot's secure enterprise version while studying at Charles Sturt. This means your data is protected when using the secure version of Copilot via a student account, hence your data isn't retained or used for training the genAI. To find out how to access, head over to Charles Sturt's Microsoft Copilot page.
Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples.
Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.