Skip to Main Content

Postgraduate Nursing: Critical appraisal and Evaluation of research

formerly Master of Nursing

Introduction to critical appraisal and evaluation

The information you use in your research and study must all be credible, reliable and relevant. Part of the Evidence-Based Practice process is to critically appraise scientific papers, but in general, all the resources you refer to should be evaluated carefully to ensure their credibility.

How can you tell whether the resources you've found are credible and suitable for you to reference? To evaluate Information you have found on websites, see the video below and the box on using Internet sites. Journal articles and academic texts should at least have gone through a process of peer review (see the video about peer review on the Journals page of this guide).

Critical appraisal of scientific papers takes the evaluation to another level. Once you have asked the clinical question and searched for evidence, it's often not enough that you've checked for peer review if you want to find the very best evidence - it will ensure that studies with scientific flaws are disregarded, and the ones you include are relevant to your question.

In the Evidence-Based Practice process, and especially in the process of evaluating primary research (which hasn't been pre-appraised or filtered by others), we need to go beyond the usual general information evaluation and make sure the evidence we are using is scientifically rigorous. The main questions to address are:

  • Is the study relevant to your clinical question?
  • How well (scientifically) was the study done, especially taking care to eliminate bias?
  • What do the results mean and are they statistically valid (and not just due to chance)?

For a more detailed look at Critical Appraisal, head to the Systematic Review Guide - Critical Appraisal and the Evidence-Based Practice Guide - Appraise.

Critical appraisal tools

Fortunately, there have been some great checklist tools developed for different types of studies. Here are some examples:

  • The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) provides access to critical appraisal tools, a collection of checklists that you can use to help you appraise or evaluate research.
  • Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) is part of Better Value Healthcare based in Oxford, UK. It includes a series of checklists, suitable for different types of studies and designed to be used when reading research.
  • The Equator Network is devoted to Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research. Among other functions, they include a Toolkit for Peer Reviewing Health Research which is very useful as a guide for critically appraising studies.
  • Critical Appraisal Tools (CEBM) - This site from the Centre of Evidence Based Medicine includes tools and worksheets for the critical appraisal of different types of medical evidence.
  • Understanding Health Research - is from the Medical Research Council in the UK. It's a very handy all-purpose tool which takes you through a series of questions about a particular article, highlighting the good points and possible problem areas. You can print off a summary at the end of your checklist

  • Critical appraisal tools from the NHS in Scotland links interactively to all sorts of resources on how to identify the study type and build your critical appraisal skills, as well as to tools themselves.

Critical reading and understanding research

A useful series of articles for nurses about critiquing and understanding types of research has been published in the Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing by Rebecca Ingham-Broomfield, from the University of New South Wales:

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2014). A nurses' guide to the critical reading of research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(1), 37-44.
[Updated from 2008.]

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2014). A nurses' guide to quantitative research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 32-38. 

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2015). A nurses' guide to qualitative research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(3), 34-40. 

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2016). A nurses' guide to mixed methods research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 46-52. 

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2016). A nurses' guide to the hierarchy of research designs and evidence. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(3), 38-43. 

Evaluate internet resources

The website domain gives you an idea of the reliability of a website:

.edu (educational institution)

.gov (government)

 These are more likely to be reliable and unbiased.

.org (non-profit organisation)

.asn (non-commercial organisation)

 Sometimes these organisations may show a bias toward one side of a topic.

.com (commercial site)

.net (network)

Critically evaluate these sites as they may be unreliable.

 

Charles Sturt University acknowledges the traditional custodians of the lands on which its campuses are located, paying respect to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations Peoples.Acknowledgement of Country

Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.